Still good advice: the Center for Democracy & Technology's report on research
into fighting spam from the consumer's side. Key conclusions from
that study:
E-mail addresses harvested from the public Web appear to have a
relatively short "shelf life." When e-mail addresses we posted on the
public Web were removed, there was a pronounced drop in the amount of
spam they received each day. The change was not absolute—on a given
day, an address might receive a few spam messages even months after it
had been removed from the public Web. But such spam was on the order of
2 or 3 messages per day, compared to the thirty or more messages
received by addresses still on the public Web.
* * *
Obscuring an e-mail address is an effective way to avoid spam from
harvesters on the Web or on USENET newsgroups. Even when posted in
publicly accessible areas, none of the addresses we
obscured—whether in English ("example at domain dot com") or in
HTML—received a single piece of spam. Users who want to avoid spam
should consider obscuring their addresses when possible.
The Center's report is dated March, 2003. A follow-up study would be
great, especially to find out whether harvesting robots have gotten
smarter about decoding obscured e-mail addresses.
The Center also links to a free e-mail address
obscurer.
posted:
10:19:47 AM
|